Does anyone still use cassette recorders?
Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn
-
Kevin Holmes
- Posts: 112
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Lower Paxton, PA USA
Does anyone still use cassette recorders?
I have a Fostex x34 that I bought in 2002 but never used.
All of the newer stuff seems to be digital and way cheaper that what I paid.
I figured that I'd use the recorder that I have until I can afford an eight or sixteen track.
Is this reasonable thinking?
Any input'd be appreciated.
--Kevin
All of the newer stuff seems to be digital and way cheaper that what I paid.
I figured that I'd use the recorder that I have until I can afford an eight or sixteen track.
Is this reasonable thinking?
Any input'd be appreciated.
--Kevin
-
Pete Macomber
- Posts: 79
- Joined: 16 Jun 2005 12:01 am
- Location: San Francisco, California
Don't toss that machine out! It will always be useful for its simplicity and analog glory. I have an old teac in mint condition. The tone is quite good and tracks can be easily dumped to a computer for post production.
-Useful for widening the gamut of tones captured.
Keep it dust free, in a case.
You have a very useful tool there.
-Useful for widening the gamut of tones captured.
Keep it dust free, in a case.
You have a very useful tool there.
-
Kevin Holmes
- Posts: 112
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Lower Paxton, PA USA
Thanks for both of your replies.
I did expect that because of tape's limitations, I'd want to move to a digital unit when I could afford to(probably in the summer).
I was hoping that I'd be able to use the 4-track till then, because some of the accessories (like monitors) I'd need for a digital recorder anyway.
--Kevin
I did expect that because of tape's limitations, I'd want to move to a digital unit when I could afford to(probably in the summer).
I was hoping that I'd be able to use the 4-track till then, because some of the accessories (like monitors) I'd need for a digital recorder anyway.
--Kevin
-
Tony Prior
- Posts: 14711
- Joined: 17 Oct 2001 12:01 am
- Location: Charlotte NC
-
Dick Wood
- Posts: 3071
- Joined: 2 May 2005 12:01 am
- Location: Springtown Texas, USA
-
richard burton
- Posts: 3854
- Joined: 23 Jan 2001 1:01 am
- Location: Britain
-
Alan Brookes
- Posts: 13227
- Joined: 29 Mar 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Brummy living in Southern California
I still use a Tascam 8-channel reel-to-reel a lot. I have a digital 24-channel recorder, but the Tascam is easier to use. The worst that can happen on tape is stretching or breaking, and you still have a recording. With a hard disk or minidisks you can put in hours of work and then be confronted with the dreaded message, "Disk Read Error", at which stage you've lost everything.
