Which software to buy
Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn
-
Jim Peters
- Posts: 1481
- Joined: 29 Dec 2003 1:01 am
- Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA, R.I.P.
Which software to buy
I'm gonna upgrade my software(PC). Now I have Ntrak, it works well, but is only 16 bit. The upgrade will cost $75, I have a very old version. The question, should I go with a more standard system? I want to spend around $100, so I'm looking at Cakewalk, Cubase, Pro Tools(light versions). I need 24 track, 24 bit, 96Khz, the ability to use VST plugins. I have Delta 10-10LT, a 1.3 Athlon PC,512Ram. Thanks for your ideas, JP
-
Ray Minich
- Posts: 6431
- Joined: 22 Jul 2003 12:01 am
- Location: Bradford, Pa. Frozen Tundra
-
Jim Peters
- Posts: 1481
- Joined: 29 Dec 2003 1:01 am
- Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA, R.I.P.
-
David L. Donald
- Posts: 13700
- Joined: 17 Feb 2003 1:01 am
- Location: Koh Samui Island, Thailand
-
Randy Cordle
- Posts: 134
- Joined: 8 Jun 2006 12:01 am
- Location: Illinois, USA
May I suggest Tracktion?
Had Pro Audio 9 and don't use it anymore after I started using Mackie Tracktion. http://www.mackie.com/products/tracktion2/index.html
Had Pro Audio 9 and don't use it anymore after I started using Mackie Tracktion. http://www.mackie.com/products/tracktion2/index.html
-
Mark van Allen
- Posts: 6425
- Joined: 26 Sep 1999 12:01 am
- Location: Watkinsville, Ga. USA
I beg to differ with Ray, but if you went with a ProTools LE rack or desk rig, the soundcard doesn't even come into play. All of the conversion and processing is done in the rack and program, connect via firewire.
You monitor through external amp/ spkrs or powered monitors, like most studio configurations. I've been using the LE rack system for Pro level recordings for some time now, and it does everything I want.
24 bit 96K no problem. I generally record 24 bit at 41.5. So far, so good. And translates easily to most any other pro studio if need be.
You monitor through external amp/ spkrs or powered monitors, like most studio configurations. I've been using the LE rack system for Pro level recordings for some time now, and it does everything I want.
24 bit 96K no problem. I generally record 24 bit at 41.5. So far, so good. And translates easily to most any other pro studio if need be.
-
Mark van Allen
- Posts: 6425
- Joined: 26 Sep 1999 12:01 am
- Location: Watkinsville, Ga. USA
-
Jim Peters
- Posts: 1481
- Joined: 29 Dec 2003 1:01 am
- Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA, R.I.P.
-
John Macy
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Rockport TX/Denver CO
-
John Macy
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Rockport TX/Denver CO
-
David L. Donald
- Posts: 13700
- Joined: 17 Feb 2003 1:01 am
- Location: Koh Samui Island, Thailand
-
Jim Peters
- Posts: 1481
- Joined: 29 Dec 2003 1:01 am
- Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA, R.I.P.
-
Jonathan Shacklock
- Posts: 681
- Joined: 11 Jan 2006 1:01 am
- Location: London, UK
-
Reggie Duncan
- Posts: 2321
- Joined: 17 Dec 2001 1:01 am
- Location: Mississippi
-
John Macy
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Rockport TX/Denver CO
-
David L. Donald
- Posts: 13700
- Joined: 17 Feb 2003 1:01 am
- Location: Koh Samui Island, Thailand
-
Bob Martin
- Posts: 1871
- Joined: 27 Feb 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Madison Tn
Hi Jim, no matter what anyone says there is no standard in recording sw. If you already have Tracktition or any other sw app and you know how to operate it and like all the features then there's absolutely no question. Buy what you already know how to use unless you're a glutton for the punishment of the steep learning curve of buying a new sw recording app. Why switch to an unknown sw app and start from the beginning? as long as you can upgrade to the newer version of your app and you like it stick with it.
In todays recording world it doesn't make a whole lot of difference what sw app you use you can import wav tracks into most of them so you will be able to work on other peoples tracks no matter what sw app they were recorded in.
Now if your current sw app has a lot of little things that bugs you well then the answer is completely different but like I say if you like everything except the 16 bit limit and you can upgrade that cheap it's a no brainer.
I use Sonar and other folks love it but the next guy that comes along might use a hardware recorder and swear by it so why not go with what you already know???????
Bob
In todays recording world it doesn't make a whole lot of difference what sw app you use you can import wav tracks into most of them so you will be able to work on other peoples tracks no matter what sw app they were recorded in.
Now if your current sw app has a lot of little things that bugs you well then the answer is completely different but like I say if you like everything except the 16 bit limit and you can upgrade that cheap it's a no brainer.
I use Sonar and other folks love it but the next guy that comes along might use a hardware recorder and swear by it so why not go with what you already know???????
Bob
-
Mark van Allen
- Posts: 6425
- Joined: 26 Sep 1999 12:01 am
- Location: Watkinsville, Ga. USA
-
Ben Jones
- Posts: 3356
- Joined: 12 Dec 2005 1:01 am
- Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
-
James Quackenbush
- Posts: 2989
- Joined: 27 Sep 2002 12:01 am
- Location: Pomona, New York, USA
Tracktion is not as full featured as a lot of other programs , but each release has more and more added to it ....It's a very easy interface to grasp ...I like it a lot for an "easy to use " program ... The engine in Tracktion is a nice sounding unit also ...You could do better, but you could do a lot worse too !!....Not a bad product ...
There are a lot of companies that have demo's of their programs also ....Pick the one you feel the most comfortable with ..Jim
There are a lot of companies that have demo's of their programs also ....Pick the one you feel the most comfortable with ..Jim
-
Jim Peters
- Posts: 1481
- Joined: 29 Dec 2003 1:01 am
- Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA, R.I.P.
Well, today I bought Sonar home studio, I think it is the best bang for the buck, and does all I want to do. Cubase was $40 more. I was leaning towards traction, but the demo version locked up my puter, and some local friends talked me out of it. Thanks for all your suggestions, I considered them all. JP
-
James Quackenbush
- Posts: 2989
- Joined: 27 Sep 2002 12:01 am
- Location: Pomona, New York, USA
Jim,
Sonar is probably the most used sequencer software out there for PC ...You made a good choice ...I mentioned Tracktion for it's ease of use , but if you start now with a lesser version of Sonar , you will be versed in Sonar when you make the move to the more advanced version .... Good choice !!..Enjoy !!....Sincerely,Jim
Sonar is probably the most used sequencer software out there for PC ...You made a good choice ...I mentioned Tracktion for it's ease of use , but if you start now with a lesser version of Sonar , you will be versed in Sonar when you make the move to the more advanced version .... Good choice !!..Enjoy !!....Sincerely,Jim
-
Bob Martin
- Posts: 1871
- Joined: 27 Feb 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Madison Tn
Hey Jim, I'm certain you'll like Sonar Home Studio. It has a great engine beneath the hood. I think it uses Sonar 3's engine which was a very stable and fast engine and had all the bugs worked out. When I say engine I'm just referring to the software that runs the recording process. There are many folks here on the board that use Sonar so good luck and let us know if we can be of any help.
Bob
Bob
-
Jim Peters
- Posts: 1481
- Joined: 29 Dec 2003 1:01 am
- Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA, R.I.P.

